|
|
|
| The value analysis of ultrasound BI-RADS combined with ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of breast masses |
| HONG Min1, LI Yunting1, HOU Chunjie2. |
| 1.Department of Ultrasonography, Pan’an County People’s Hospital, Jinhua, 322300; 2.Department of Ultrasonography, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, 310014 |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
HONG Min,LI Yunting,HOU Chunjie.. The value analysis of ultrasound BI-RADS combined with ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of breast masses[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2017, 47(10): 766-770.
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To investigate the value of the breast imaging reporting and data analysis system (BI-RADS) combined with ultrasonic elastography (UE) in the breast masses diagnosis. Methods: 142 breast tumors were collected from125 cases of patients with breast tumors from January 2014 to December 2015, then we classified all breast masses by the ultrasonic BI-RADS, and had a ultrasound elastography (UE) examination, which the pathological results were used as the gold standard for diagnosis, to study the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate of two methods single-handed and combined application. Results: There were 142 lesions in this study, of which 81 were benign lesions and 61 were malignant lesions. UE three law diagnosis results show that statistically significant differences in UE scores between benign and malignant breast lesions (P<0.05), the sensitivity of UE in diagnosis of malignant lesions was 78.69%, the specificity was 81.48%, the positive predictive value was 83.54%, the negative predictive value was 76.19%. BI-RADS classification results showed statistically significant differences in classification of benign and malignant breast lesions (P<0.05), the sensitivity of diagnosis of malignant lesions in BI-RADS classification was 72.13%, the specificity was 77.78%, the positive predictive value was 70.97%, the negative predictive value was 78.75%. On the basis of traditional ultrasonic BI-RADS classification combined with UE adjustment, the 2 methods were compared with the pre adjustment results, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: UE score method can improve the sensitivity and specificity of BI-RADS classification for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
|
|
Received: 11 October 2016
|
| |
|
|
|
[1] 黄嘉静, 陈玉英. 联合超声弹性成像与超声BIRADS在乳腺病变诊断中的价值[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2014, 29(6): 642-648.
[2] 张建兴. 乳腺超声诊断学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012: 213-219.
[3] 管玲, 王丽云, 段颖, 等. 超声造影联合超声BI-RADS分级在乳腺癌诊断中的应用[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2014, 36(13): 1430-1433.
[4] 詹维伟, 周建桥. 乳腺超声影像报告与数据系统解读[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 95-97.
[5] 智慧, 肖晓云, 杨海云, 等. BI-RADS诊断标准与UE结合对乳腺肿物诊断价值的探讨[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2011, 27(4): 310-312.
[6] 郑雅兰, 郑媛, 宋会明, 等. 超声征象在诊断BI-RADS 4级乳腺病变的临床价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2014, 25(2): 124-126.
[7] 艾慧俊, 纪建松, 陈方红, 等. 乳腺病灶超声弹性成像与病理的对照[J]. 温州医学院学报, 2011, 41(3): 282-284.
[8] 王文韬, 陈琮瑛, 李胜利, 等. 超声乳腺影像学报告及数据系统鉴别诊断乳腺小肿块[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学, 2014, 4(10): 599-600.
[9] 郝少云, 欧冰, 钟文景, 等. 超声弹性成像在BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿物中的诊断价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 30(4): 303-306.
[10] 陈晓姣, 潘自来, 李丽蟾, 等. BI-RADS-US第二版超声弹性成像在乳腺疾病诊断中的应用价值[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2015, 14(3): 239-243.
[11] 杜燕然, 陈曼, 唐蕾, 等. 乳腺小肿块BI-RADS及超声弹性成像的临床研究[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2016, 32(1): 22-25. |
| [1] |
. [J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2022, 52(9): 767-770. |
|
|
|
|
