|
|
|
| Applicated studies of 23 items revise of review criteria in Sysmex Hematology sampler transport HST-N302 |
| LI Xiaolong1, WANG Mingshan2, WANG Weiwei2, WANG Saifang2, XIE Haixiao2, LYU Jianxin1 |
| 1.School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035; 2.Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Midical University, Wenzhou, 325015 |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
LI Xiaolong,WANG Mingshan,WANG Weiwei, et al. Applicated studies of 23 items revise of review criteria in Sysmex Hematology sampler transport HST-N302[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2017, 47(8): 595-598.
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the XE-2100 hematology review criteria suggested by internal consensus group with Sysmex Hematology sampler transport HST-N302. And to perfect review criteria of our clinical laboratory. Methods: The total 25 097 patients’ blood samples were respectively detected and stained seminal smear randomly with the methods of Automated Hematology Analysis on Sysmex HST-N302 base on hematology review criteria suggested by internal consensus group (review criteria 1 in short), hematology review criteria suggested by internal consensus group and LIS history record and scatter diagram (review criteria 2 in short), at the same time, differential leukocyte on the smear included positive and negative sample were counted with the microscope by two docimaster. Calculated true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), false negative (FN) and the ratio of review quantity, then studied out optimal program. Results: According to review criteria 1: TN, FN, TP, FP and review rate respectively were 70.10%, 1.33%, 4.15%, 24.42%, 28.57%. According to review criteria 2: The TN, FN, TP, FP and review rate respectively were 89.89%, 1.22%, 2.32%, 6.58%, 8.90%. Conclusion: It can enhance work efficiency and reduce unnecessary labor work to utilize new review criteria.
|
|
Received: 08 October 2016
|
| |
|
|
|
[1] BAMES P W, MCFADDEN S L, MACHIN S J, et al. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis[J]. Lab Hematol, 2005, 11(2): 83-90.
[2] XE-2100血细胞分析复检标准制定协作组. Sysmex XE-2100自动血细胞分析和白细胞分类的复检规则探讨[J].中华检验医学杂志, 2008, 31(7): 752-757.
[3] 王厚芳, 孙芾, 于贵杰, 等. 国际血细胞复检规则在贝克曼-库尔特系列血细胞分析仪上的应用及改进方案[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2008, 31(7): 758-762.
[4] 叶应妩, 王毓三, 申子瑜. 全国临床检验操作规程[M]. 3版.南京: 东南大学出版社, 2006.
[5] 中华人民共和国卫生部. 中华人民共和国卫生部行业标准: 白细胞分类计数参考方法WS/T246-2005[S]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2005.
[6] 中华检验医学杂志编辑委员会. 全国血液学复检专家小组工作会议纪要暨血细胞自动计数复检标准释义[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2007, 30(4): 380-382.
[7] 丛玉隆, 王昌富, 乐家新. 血细胞自动化分析后血涂片复审标准制定的原则与步骤[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2008, 31(7): 729-732.
[8] 唐玉凤, 陈艳佩, 董美衬, 等. Sysmex HST-302全自动血液分析系统复检规则的优化及验证[J]. 中国医学装备, 2016, 13(5): 34-37.
[9] 高胜海, 孙荣同, 常鑫. HST302血液分析流水线血片复检规则及临床应用[J]. 医学检验, 2011, 18(33): 76-79.
[10] 石玉玲, 孙朝晖, 杭建峰, 等. 用Laboman软件建立血液分析双向通信模式与复检规则优化[J].临床检验杂志, 2013,31(1): 63-64. |
|
|
|
