|
|
|
| The efficacy of BiPAP and Auto-CPAP in patients with severe OSAHS accompanied with mild-to-moderate COPD |
| YE Huan, SHAO Meiqin, SHI Xiaohong, WU Lifeng, XU Bin, CHENG Hengjin. |
Department of Respiratory Medicine, the People’s Hospital of Wenzhou, Wenzhou, 325000
|
|
| Cite this article: |
|
YE Huan,SHAO Meiqin,SHI Xiaohong, et al. The efficacy of BiPAP and Auto-CPAP in patients with severe OSAHS accompanied with mild-to-moderate COPD[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2017, 47(5): 342-346.
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) and automatic pressure model of continuous positive airway pressure (Auto-CPAP) ventilation in the treatment of elderly patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) accompanied with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: According to the random number table, 40 elderly patients with severe OSAHS accompanied with mild-to-moderate COPD were randomly divided into BiPAP group and Auto-CPAP group (n=20, each). The parameters were monitored at the 7th day, 30th day, 90th day and 180th day, which included apnea hypopnea index (AHI), the mean pulse oxygen saturation (M-SpO2), the lowest pulse oxygen saturation (L-SpO2), blood gas analysis (pH, PaCO2, PaO2), the changes of pulmonary function (FEV1/FVC, FEV1%), the mean effective pressure required for ventilation treatment, the ventilator average time nightly, Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), COPD assessment test (CAT), and the hospitalization rate of acute COPD in 180 days were recorded. Results: At the 7th day, 30th day, 90th day and 180th day after treatment, AHI, M-SpO2, L-SpO2, pH, PaCO2, PaO2, FEV1/FVC, FEV1%, ESS and CAT all had no significant differences between BiPAP and Auto-CPAP group (P>0.05). The effective pressure required for ventilation treatment in Auto-CPAP group was less than that in BiPAP group, and the ventilator average time nightly in Auto-CPAP group was more than that in BiPAP group (P<0.05). The hospitalization rate of acute COPD in 180 days showed no significant difference between these two groups (P>0.05). The parameters such as AHI, PaCO2, ESS and CAT at the 7th day, 30th day, 90th day and 180th day were all lower than those before therapy, and the parameters such as PaO2, M-SpO2 and L-SpO2 at the 7th day, 30th day, 90th day and 180th day were all higher than those before therapy in these two groups (P<0.05). FEV1/FVC, FEV1% were slightly higher than those before treatment, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). pH showed no significant difference before and after treatment (P>0.05). Obvious adverse reaction, such as skin bruised, abdominal distension and pneumothorax didn’t happen in all cases. Conclusion: There is no significant difference between BiPAP and Auto-CPAP in efficacy and safety, but patients’ compliance to Auto-CPAP is better than that to BiPAP. Furthermore, Auto-CPAP may be a better choice for patients with poor economic conditions who suffered from severe OSAHS accompanied with mild-to- moderate COPD because Auto-CPAP requires lower pressure.
|
|
Received: 02 November 2016
|
| |
|
|
|
[1] 叶环, 徐滨, 施肖红, 等. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者脂质代谢指标及血栓前状态指标的分析[J]. 温州医科大学学报, 2014, 44(7): 503-507.
[2] QASEEM A, HOLTY J E, OWENS D K, et al. Management of obstructive sleep apnea in adults: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2013, 159(7): 471-483.
[3] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会睡眠呼吸障碍学组. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征诊治指南(2011年修订版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2012, 35(1): 9-12.
[4] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2013年修订版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2013, 36(4): 255-264.
[5] JACOBSEN R, FROLICH A, GODTFREDSEN N S. Impact of exercise capacity on dyspnea and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev, 2012, 32(2): 92-100.
[6] 王慧玲. 无创通气治疗对慢性阻塞性肺病合并睡眠呼吸暂停患者呼吸中枢反应性的影响[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2007, 87(31): 2193-2197.
[7] 吴纯刚. 老年OSAHS并COPD患者辅助通气治疗前后多导睡眠监测及肺功能检查分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2011, 31(4): 1324-1325.
[8] KUSHIDAFOR C A, LITTMER M R, HIRSHKOWITZ M, et al. Practice parameters for the use of continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure devices to treat adult patients with sleep-related breathing disorders[J]. Sleep, 2006, 29(3): 375-380.
|
| [1] |
. [J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2022, 52(6): 498-501. |
|
|
|
|
