|
|
|
| Feasibility study on clinical application of the new labor standards in Wenzhou |
Department of Obstetrics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027
|
|
| Cite this article: |
|
Jin Xubing,Jin Jiaxi,Huang Xianping, et al. Feasibility study on clinical application of the new labor standards in Wenzhou[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2017, 47(4): 290-292.
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To explore the feasibility of application of the new labor standards in Wenzhou. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Objects included were primiparas who had singleton full-term primipara, cephalic presentation and spontaneous delivery. The study was divided into new and old labor group. According to whether labor analgesia implemented, the two groups were compared respectively in the Cesarean delivery rate (CDR), rate of artificial rupture, rate of forceps delivery, duration of labor, rate of intrapartum fever, postpartum hemorrhage in 2 hours and incidence of neonatal asphyxia. Results: The CDR and the rate of artificial rupture of the new labor group was significantly decrease compared with the old labor group (P<0.01); The main Cesarean section indications of the new labor group was fetal distress, while that under the condition of the old labor group was protracted and arrested active phase; With the implementation of labor analgesia, rate of oxytocin usage, rate of intrapartum fever, span of the first and the second stage of labor, postpartum hemorrhage in 2 hours and incidence of neonatal asphyxia in the new labor group were significantly higher than that in the old labor group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Although the new labor standards increased the rate of oxytocin usage, the rate of intrapartum fever and the incidence of neonatal asphyxia, it reduced the initial CDR and the rate of artificial rupture. In general, the new labor standard is worth to popularize.
|
|
Received: 29 June 2016
|
| |
|
|
|
[1] 中华医学会妇产科学会组. 新产程标准和处理的专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科学杂志, 2014, 49(7): 486-486.
[2] 张军, 杨祖菁, 霍晓娜. 产程图的研究进展[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2014, 17(3): 145-145.
[3] MATTHEW H. Maternal and fetal impact of SMFM guidelines to prevent the first cesarean delivery[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 212(1): S112-S113.
[4] SALAMALEKIS E, BAKAS P, SALOUM I, et al. Severe variable decelerations and fetal pulse oximetry during second stage of labor[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2005, 20(6): 31-34.
[5] ZHANG J, LANDY H J, BRANCH D W, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116(6): 1281-1287.
[6] SMYTH R M, MARKHAM C, DOWSWELL T. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013(1): CD006167.
|
|
|
|
