|
|
The early clinical curative effect of percutaneous transforaminal approach spinal endoscopy for treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients |
eng Dun1, Yan Haibo1, Lin Xianfa1, Chen Liqiu1, Zhang Weikang1, Zhan Gonghao2. |
1.Department of Orthopedic,the First People’s Hospital of Wenling, Taizhou, 317500; 2.Department of Pain, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027
|
|
Cite this article: |
eng Dun,Yan Haibo,Lin Xianfa, et al. The early clinical curative effect of percutaneous transforaminal approach spinal endoscopy for treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2017, 47(4): 273-276.
|
|
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the early clinical efficacy of minimal invasive transforaminal endoscopic spine system for treatment of single segment degenerative lumbar spinal in elderly patients. Methods: From January 2013 to January 2014, eighty single segment degenerative lumbar spinal elderly patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the random number table (n=40). The research group was undergone percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and spine canal enlarged as well as relaxing the nerve. The control group were treated by opening lamina resection decompression as well as spine canal enlarged, interbody fusion and internal fixation. The Mac Nab’s criteria, ODI score, visual analogue scale (VAS), Lehmann low-back rating scale, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores (JOA), the hospital stay time, the intraoperatve blood loss, the surgical complications in the two groups were reviewed and compared between the preoperative and postoperative. Results: The research group was superior than the control group in the Mac Nab’s criteria, ODI score, VAS score, JOA score, the hospital stay time, the intraoperative blood loss, the surgical complications. Their differences were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: The minimal invasive transforaminal endoscopic spine system for treatment of single segment degenerative lumbar spinal in elderly patients has the advantages of small trauma, earlier rehabilitation and good effects.
|
Received: 09 July 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] AHN Y, LEE S. Postoperative spondylodiscitis following transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: clinical characteristics and preventive strategies[J]. Br J Neurosurg, 2012, 26(4): 482-486.
[2] 夏子寰, 伍骥, 郑超, 等. 精准减压和非融合技术与传统融合手术治疗老年节段性腰椎管狭窄的短期临床效果比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2013, 21(11): 1073-1080.
[3] 许勇, 陈仙, 李利平, 等. 经皮椎间孔镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症的体会[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2013, 28(7): 651-652.
[4] 黎庆初, 尹刚辉, 张忠民, 等. 微创Wiltse入路与传统后正中入路手术治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2012, 22(9): 812-817.
[5] 胡德新, 郑琦, 朱博, 等. 经皮椎间孔镜下选择性减压治疗老年性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效分析[J]. 中国骨伤, 2014, 27(3): 194-198.
[6] 毛克亚, 王岩, 肖嵩华, 等. 微创手术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的疗效评价[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2011, 21(2): 113-117.
[7] YEUNG A F, TSOU P M. Posterolateral endoscopic exicision for lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases[J]. Spine, 2012, 27(7): 722-731.
[8] LIAO Z, CHEN W, WANG C. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic surgery for far lateral lumbar intervertebral disk herniation[J]. Orthopedics, 2014, 37(8): 717-727.
[9] 柳万国, 唐成林, 刘理迪, 等. 腰椎椎间孔狭窄症的诊断和手术治疗进展[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2015, 5(5): 465-470.
[10] 陈远明, 王建, 周跃, 等. 经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗下腰痛[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2012, 6(3): 78-81.
[11] 姚辉, 徐义春, 陈碧英, 等. 侧路经皮椎间孔镜技术在腰椎后路术后再次手术中的应用[J]. 中国骨伤, 2015, 8(20): 712-716.
[12] 陈之光, 付勤. 椎间孔镜经不同入路治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床进展[J]. 中国骨伤, 2012, 25(12): 1057-1060.
[13] 何升华, 彭俊宇, 赵祥. 经皮椎间孔镜椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症近期疗效观察[J]. 中国骨伤, 2011, 24(1):72-74.
[14] YOSHIKAWA H, ANDOH T, TARUMOTO Y, et al. Usefulness of epidural anesthesia for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD)[J]. Masui, 2014, 60(12): 1370-1377.
[15] HIRANO Y, MIZUNO J, TAKEDA M, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy-early clinical experience[J].Neurol Med Chir, 2013, 52(9): 625-630.
[16] 周煜达, 叶祥明, 谭同才, 等. 麦肯基疗法联合核心稳定性训练对腰椎间盘突出症患者的疗效观察[J]. 温州医科大学学报, 2014, 44(8): 589-592.
|
|
|
|