|
|
Characteristic analysis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by color Doppler ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography |
WANG Xiaohua, PAN Yin, LUO Hongxia, LIN Yiyi. |
Department of Ultrasonics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027
|
|
Cite this article: |
WANG Xiaohua,PAN Yin,LUO Hongxia, et al. Characteristic analysis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by color Doppler ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2016, 46(12): 923-926.
|
|
Abstract Objective: To explore the imaging features between color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and evaluate the performance characteristics. Methods: The features of CDFI and CEUS of 34 CCRCC confirmed by operation and pathology were retrospectively analyzed, the characteristics of CDFI and the enhancement and wash out in different phases of CEUS were analyzed. Results: ①The imaging features of CDFI in CCRCC could be classified as two types, 10 cases of the CCRCC were rich in blood and the blood flow were not rich and in 24 cases. ②Enhancement patterns of renal clear cell carcinoma could be performed differently, and they were divided into four models. Twenty-six cases of the CCRCC indicated contrast enhancement patterns of fast in and fast out; six cases indicated that fast in and slow out; one case indicated that slow in and slow out; one case indicated that slow in and fast out. The degree of enhancement was divided into three types. Twenty-five cases of the CCRCC performed as hyper-enhancement; five cases performed as iso-enhancement; four cases performed as hypo-enhancement. The enhancement shape were mainly performed as two types, fourteen cases as rim enhancement and twenty cases as nonhomegeneous enhancement. The performance characteristics of CCRCC in the imaging of CEUS were fast in and fast out, the peak intensity, rim enhancement, nonhomegeneous enhancement. The diagnostic accuracy of CCRCC was 52.94% by CDFI and was 82.35% by CEUS, where significant difference was observed (P<0.05). Conclusion: CEUS shows some characteristic enhancement features, can display tumor vascularity and blood perfusion feature more sensitively than CDFI, and the confidence can be improved by the application of CEUS combined with CDFI.
|
Received: 21 April 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 吴恩惠, 李松年. 中华影像医学·泌尿生殖系统卷[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2003: 79-82.
[2] 张华, 赵玉珍. 肾细胞癌血管生成的临床进展研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2003, 12(3): 172-173.
[3] 杜联芳, 李凡, 姜露莹, 等. 超声造影在肾占位性病变中的应用[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2006, 15(11): 813-815.
[4] TRANQUART F, CORREAS J M, MARTEGANI A, et al. Feasability of real time contrast enhanced ultrasound in renal disease[J]. J Radiol, 2004, 85(1): 31-36.
[5] WANG Z, TANG J, AN L, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for assessment of tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2007, 26(6): 757-762.
[6] TAMAI H, TAKIGUCHI Y, OKA M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of solid renal tumors [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2005, 24(12): 1635-1640.
[7] XUE L Y, LU Q, HUANG B J, et a1. Evaluation of renal urothelial carcinoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(4): e151-e157.
[8] NILSSON A. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys[J]. Eur Radiol, 2004, 41(suppl 8): P104-P109.
[9] 傅宁华, 杨斌, 孟庆欢, 等.肾恶性肿瘤超声造影与病理对照分析[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2008, 24(5): 725-727.
[10] PARK B K, KIM S H, CHOI H J, et al. Characterization of renal cell carcinoma using agent defection imaging: comparison wirh gray-scale US[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2005, 6(3): 173-178.
[11] XU Z F, XU H X, XIE X Y, et al. Renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma: differential diagnosis with real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2010, 29(5): 709-717.
[12] ASCENTI G, GAETA M, MAGNO C, et al. Contrast-enhanced second-harmonic sonography in the detection of pseudocapsule in the renal cell carcinoma[J]. AJR Am J Roent-genol, 2004, 182(6): 1525-1530.
|
|
|
|