|
|
Modified urethral dilatation under direct vision of endoscope to treat the urethral stricture in 20 cases |
YANG Yu1, HUANG Hang1, DENG Zhexian1, XIE Hui1, ZHANG Yan2 |
1.Departmen of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325015; 2.Department of Transplantation, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou. 325015
|
|
Cite this article: |
YANG Yu,HUANG Hang,DENG Zhexian, et al. Modified urethral dilatation under direct vision of endoscope to treat the urethral stricture in 20 cases[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2016, 46(3): 218-220.
|
|
Abstract Objective: To explore the method of the urethral under cystoscopy to treat the urethrostenosis and to evaluate the curative effect of this method. Methods: The therapeutic data of the urethrostenosis in 20 cases admitted to our hospital from September 2010 to September 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Of them, 11 cases had the history of lower abdominal open operation and all of them were admitted to hospital because of acute urine retention and failure to indwell catheter and urethral dilatation. All patients were further dilated with cystoscopy under direct vision of 19.5 F cystoscopy after the ureteral catheter dilatation. 16 F and 18 F catheters were indwelled for 1-2 weeks after operation, then the conventional regular dilatation was performed. Results: Operations were successfully performed and catheter was indwelled in 20 cases. Of them, the conventional urethral dilatation could be smoothly performed under the blindness and urine could swimmingly urinate after catheter was removed postoperatively 1 week. Postoperative follow-up for 3 months-2 years. Five cases of swimmingly urination needn’t treat again, the rest of patients could smoothly undergo regular urethral dilatation. Conclusion: The endoscope dilatation technique for treatment of urethral stricture has better effect, and can avoid urethral false passage, especially for patients with acute urinary retention with lower abdominal open operation history and can avoid risks of bladder puncture fistulation and the intestinal perforation.
|
Received: 04 June 2015
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 吴阶平. 泌尿外科学[M]. 济南: 山东科技出版社, 2004:856-857.
[2] 韦华玉, 梁建波, 何大光. 窥镜直视下硬性扩张治疗尿道狭窄(附35例报告)[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2003, 9(3): 75-76.
[3] KESSLER T M, SCHREITER F, KRALIDIS G, et al. Longterm results of surgery for urethral stricture: a statistical analysis[J]. J Urol, 2003, 170(3): 840-844.
[4] STEENKAMP J W, HEYNS C F, DE KOCK M L. Internal urethrotomy versus dilation as treatment for male urethral strictures: a prospective, randomized comparison[J]. J Urol, 1997, 157(1): 98-101.
[5] STEENKANP J W, HEYNS F, KOCK MLS. Internal urethrotomy versus dilation as treatment for male urethral strictures: a prospective randomized eomparision[J]. J Urol, 1997, 157(1): 98-101.
[6] BENCHEKROUN A, LACHKAR A, SOUMANA A, et a1. Internal urethratomy in the treatmen to furethral stenoses (1ong term results)[J]. Ann Urol (Paris), 1998, 32(2): 99-102.
[7] 周凤昌, 陈桥志, 陈煦, 等. 内窥镜直视下直接扩张治疗尿道狭窄[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2005, 20(11): 693-694.
|
|
|
|