|
|
|
| The study of bone conduction auditory brainstem responses in infants with normal hearing |
| Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325015 |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
CHEN Jun,WANG Jingbo,PENG Jianhua, et al. The study of bone conduction auditory brainstem responses in infants with normal hearing [J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2015, 45(8): 588-.
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To study the characteristics of wave forms of the bone-conduction click-evoked auditory brainstem responses in 0～2 years old infants with normal hearing and to evaluate initially the value of its application in clinic. Methods: Air-and bone-conduction click-evoked ABRS in 24 cases of 0-2 years old infants (0-1 years, 1-2 years every 12 cases, 36 ears) with normal hearing were performed. The data were statistically analyzed with SPSS17.0. Results: The wave forms of bone-conduction ABR were almost the same as those of air-conduction at the thresholds or above. The detection rates of wave I, III and V were 29.2%, 46.7% and 100%, respectively at 35 dBnHL. The thresholds to bone-conducted ABR were (15.00±5.48) dBnHL, with the latencies of wave V were (8.32±0.54) ms. There were significant differences between ages for the thresholds and the wave V latencies (P<0.05), for aged 0-1 years infants, the thresholds to bone-conducted ABR were higher than that aged 1-2 years infants, and the wave V latencies were prolonged than aged 1-2 years groups. There were no significant differences between male and female for the thresholds and the wave V latencies. The bone-conducted wave V latency-intensity functions exhibited increased latencies as intensity decreased. Conclusion: The bone-conduction ABR is a valuable and effective method in children’s hearing test with special values in newborn hearing screening, more information on ascertaining the presence and magnitude of a conductive hearing loss can be obtained when both air and bone-conducted ABR wave V latency-intensity functions are administered.
|
|
Received: 02 April 2015
|
| |
|
|
|
[1] Yang EY, Stuart A, Mencher GT, et al. Auditory brain stem responses to air and bone-conducted clicks in the audiological assessment of at risk infants[J]. Ear Hear, 1993, 14(3):175-182.
[2] Stuart A, Yang EY, Stenstrom R. Effect of temporal area bone vibrator placement on auditory brain stem response in newborn infants[J]. Ear Hear, 1990, 11(5): 363-369.
[3] 黄芳, 魏翠芬, 刘艳. 小儿听觉诱发电位检查口服水合氯醛镇静作用的观察[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2009, 17 (1): 73-74.
[4] Muchnik C, Neeman RK, Hildesheimer M. Auditory brainstem response to bone-conducted clicks in adults and infants with normal hearing and conductive hearing loss[J]. ScandAudiol, 1995, 24(3): 185-191.
[5] 刘辉, 莫玲燕, 陈静. 短音骨导听性稳态反应中伪迹的研究[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2010, 18(3): 243-245.
[6] 李隽, 王智楠, 黄芳, 等. 0-6岁正常儿童骨导听性脑干反应的特征分析[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2011, 19(2):123-125.
[7] 杨长亮, 黄治物, 姚行齐, 等. 正常气骨导听性脑干反应及其应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 9-13.
[8] Stuart A, Yang EY, Stenstrom R, et al. Auditory brainstem response thresholds to air and bone conducted clicks in neonates and adults[J]. Am J Otol, 1993, 14(2): 176-182.
[9] Beattic RC. Normative wave V latency-intensity functions using the EARTONE 3A insert earphone and Radioear B-71 bone vibrator[J]. Scand Audiol, 1998, 27(2): 120-126.
[10] Sohmer H, Freeman S. The latency of auditory nerve brainstem evoked responses to air- and bone-conducted stimuli[J].Hear Res, 2001, 160(1-2): 111-113.
[11] 张奕, 赵纪余, 金晓杰, 等. 骨导听觉脑干电反应测试中掩蔽噪声的应用[J]. 上海第二医科大学学报, 20(5): 433-435.
[12] Fichino SN, Lewis DR, Favero ML. Electrophysiologic threshold study in air and bone conduction in children with 2 months or less age[J]. Otorrinolaringol, 2007, 73(2): 251-
256.
[13] 商莹莹, 倪道凤, 李奉荣. 气骨导短音ABR在听力正常成年人中的特性[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2007, 14(5): 239-243.
[14] 王国兴, 倪道凤, 李奉荣. 骨导听性脑干反应影响因素研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2002, 4(16): 150-152.
[15] Polyakov A, Pratt H. The cumulative effect of high click rate on monaural and binaural processing in the human audi tory brainstem[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2003, 114(2): 366-
375.
|
|
|
|
