|
|
Diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions based on DCE-MRI by using radiomics and deep learning with different networks |
ZHOU Jiejie1, ZHANG Yang2, SU Minying2, HE Xiaxia1, XU Ni’na1, YE Shuxin1, LI Jiance1, WANG Ouchen3, WANG Meihao1 |
1.Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325015, China; 2.Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine 96214, USA; 3.Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325015, China |
|
Cite this article: |
ZHOU Jiejie,ZHANG Yang,SU Minying, et al. Diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions based on DCE-MRI by using radiomics and deep learning with different networks[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2020, 50(6): 475-479.
|
|
Abstract Objective: To evaluate and compare the performance of radiomics and deep learning in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions based on DCE-MRI. Methods: A total of 152 patients receiving breast MRI for diagnosis were analyzed, including 93 patients with malignant cancers, and 59 patients with benign lesions. Three DCE parametric maps corresponding to early wash-in signal enhancement (SE), maximum signal enhancement, and wash-out slope were generated. Radiomics analysis based on texture and intensity histogram, and deep learning using 5 networks (ResNet50, VGG16, VGG19, Xception, InceptionV3), were performed for differential diagnosis. Results: The accuracy of radiomics was 80%; the smallest bounding box obtained higher diagnostic accuracy than that with tumor only and 1.2 times box which was not significant (both P>0.05), and also higher than 1.5 times box and 2.0 times box (both P<0.01); the accuracy of ResNet50 (93%), Xception (94%), InceptionV3 (93%) was significantly higher than VGG16 (80%), VGG19 (79%) (both P<0.01). Conclusion: CNN achieved better diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. The smaller bounding box containing the tumor with small amount of per-tumor tissue had the higher diagnostic accuracy than that with the tumor only and than larger bounding box.
|
Received: 05 September 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] MANN R M, KUHL C K, MOY L. Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 50(2): 377-390.
[2] LEITHNER D, WENGET G J, HELBICH T H, et al. Clinical role of breast MRI and going forward[J]. Clin Radiol, 2018, 73(8): 700-714.
[3] LAMBIN P, RIOS-VELAZQUEZ E, LEIJENAAR R, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2012, 48(4): 441-446.
[4] HOSNY A, PARMAR C, QUACKENBUSH J, et al. Artificial intelligence in radiology[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2018, 18(8): 500-510.
[5] ANWAR S M, MAJID M, QAYYUM A,et al. Medical image analysis using convolutional neural networks: A review [J]. J Med Syst, 2018, 42(11): 226.
[6] NIE K, CHEN J H, YU H J, et al. Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI[J]. Acad Radiol, 2008, 15(12): 1513-1525.
[7] LANGN, SU M, YU H, et al. Differentiation of myeloma and metastatic cancer in the spine using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 31(8): 1285-1291.
[8] CHITALIA R D, KONTOS D. Role of texture analysis in breast MRI as a cancer biomarker: A review[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2018, 49(4): 927-938.
[9] HARALICK R M, SHANMUGAM K, DINSTEIN I. Textural features for image classification[J]. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, 1973, 3(6): 610-621.
[10] LANG N, ZHANG Y, ZHANG E, et al. Differentiation of spinal metastases originated from lung and other cancers using radiomics and deep learning based on DCE-MRI[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 64: 4-12.
[11] HE K, ZHANG X, REN S, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[EB/OL].(2015-12-10)[2019-09-05]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1512.03385.pdf.
[12] SIMONYAN K, ZISSERMAN A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition[EB/OL].(2015-04-10)[2019-09-05]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.1556.pdf.
[13] Chollet F. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions[EB/OL].(2017-04-04)[2019-09-05]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.02357.pdf.
[14] SZEGEDY C, VANHOUCKE V, IOFFE S, et al. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision[EB/OL].(2015-12-11)[2019-09-05].https://arxiv.org/pdf/1512.00567.pdf.
[15] KINGMA D, BA J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization[EB/OL]. (2017-01-30)[2019-09-05]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.6980.pdf.
[16] DENG J, DONG W, SOCHER R, et al. Imagenet: A large-
scale hierarchical image database[EB/OL].(2009-08-18)[2019-09-05]. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 5206848.
[17] BURNSIDE E S, DRUKKER K, LI H, et al. Using computer-extracted image phenotypes from tumors on breast magnetic resonance imaging to predict breast cancer pathologic stage[J]. Cancer, 2016, 122(5): 748-757.
[18] LI H, ZHU Y, BURNSIDE E S, et al. Quantitative MRI radiomics in the prediction of molecular classifications of breast cancer subtypes in the TCGA/TCIA data set[J]. NPJ Breast Cancer, 2016, 2: 16012.
[19] BECKER A S, MARCON M, GHAFOOR S, et al. Deep learning in mammography diagnostic accuracy of a multipurpose image analysis software in the detection of breast cancer[J]. Invest Radiol, 2017, 52(7): 434-440.
[20] TRUHN D, SCHRADING S, HAARBURGERR C, et al. Radiomic versus convolutional neural networks analysis for classification of contrast-enhancing lesions at multiparametric breast MRI[J]. Radiology, 2018, 290(2): 181352.
[21] WU J S, SHENG S R, LIANG X H, et al. The role of tumor microenvironment in collective tumor cell invasion[J]. Futur Oncol, 2017, 13(11): 991-1002. |
[1] |
ZHOU Yongjin, GAO Ruijie, JIANG Chunyan, DENG Jingjing, XIA Shuiwei, SHEN Shaobo, WANG Zufei, JI Jiansong. CT-based radiomics nomogram to differentiate non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from solid pseudopapillary tumors[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2022, 52(8): 645-651,656. |
|
|
|
|