|
|
The application of RNA simultaneous amplification and testing in the detection of male gonococcal urethritis |
DAI Xianning, TONG Yu, LIN Jianping, Shi Jianyou, Chen Lu, XU Kai |
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Wenzhou People’s Hospital, Wenzhou 325000, China |
|
Cite this article: |
DAI Xianning,TONG Yu,LIN Jianping, et al. The application of RNA simultaneous amplification and testing in the detection of male gonococcal urethritis[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2020, 50(2): 145-148,153.
|
|
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the application value of RNA simultaneous amplification and testing technology in the detection of male gonococcal urethritis. Methods: From June 2017 to August 2018, a total of 322 male patients with suspected gonococcal urethritis infection in Wenzhou People’s Hospital were detected by RNA simultaneous amplification and testing (RNA-SAT) and real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (FQ-PCR), then the results were statistically analyzed. Results: The highest NG positive rate was 35.1% (113/322) by urine RNA-SAT method, and the lowest NG positive rate was 26.1% (84/322) by urine FQ-PCR method. The difference of positive rates in urine RNA-SAT, urine FQ-PCR and isolation culture was statistically significant (χ2=6.312, P<0.05). The difference of positive rates in swab RNA-SAT, swab FQ-PCR and isolation culture was not statistically significant (χ2=1.039, P>0.05). The highest sensitivity of urine RNA-SAT was 97.9% (93/95), and that of urine FQ-PCR method was 81.1% (77/95). According to ROC curve, swab RNA-SAT and urine RNA-SAT method have a relatively high diagnostic value (AUC>0.9). After 7 days of treatment, clinical symptoms in 81 patients disappeared and negative leukocyte were re-examined. The difference in negative rates in urine RNA-SAT, urine FQ-PCR and isolation culture was not statistically significant (χ2=2.531, P>0.05). The difference in negative rates of swab RNA-SAT, swab FQ-PCR and isolation culture was also not statistically significant (χ2=2.933, P>0.05). Conclusion: Both RNA-SAT and FQ-PCR can be used to diagnose NG infection; however, RNA-SAT has the advantages of convenient sampling, short time, little pollution and accurate results. So it can be used to detect NG in male gonococcal urethritis and to evaluate the effect and prognosis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 韩燕, 尹跃平, 戴秀芹, 等. 2008年中国淋球菌临床分离株耐药性的流行病学研究[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2011, 44(7): 472-475.
[2] 胡跃华, 李镒冲, 刘世炜, 等. 中国20年间淋球菌、性传播衣原体、梅毒螺旋体的发病情况及其疾病负担[J]. 疾病监测, 2015, 30(11): 904-910.
[3] WORKOWSKI K A. Centers for disease control and prevention sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2015, 61 Suppl 8: 759-762.
[4] 李伟月, 余进胜. 淋病奈瑟氏菌不同检测方法的效果评价[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2014(12): 2787-2788.
[5] 王彦彬, 李瑞鹏, 钟春燕, 等. 实时荧光核酸恒温扩增检测技术在泌尿生殖道淋病中的应用[J]. 浙江医学, 2016, 38(18): 1498-1500, 1503.
[6] 张伟阳, 钟建平, 杨国彪, 等. LAMP和Xpert Mtb/RIF早期诊断肺结核传染源的价值比较[J]. 温州医科大学学报, 2017, 47(1): 61-63.
[7] 吴晓初, 邵长庚, 颜艳. 男性性传播性尿道炎[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2000, 33(3): 64-66.
[8] LOESCHE W J, LOPATIN D E, STOLL J, et al. Comparison of various detection methods for periodontopathic bacteria: can culture be considered the primary reference stan-dard?[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1992, 30(2): 418-426.
[9] 吴开奇, 钟琦, 周平玉, 等. 比较PCR-荧光探针法与其他方法对性病门诊中衣原体和淋球菌检出率的影响[J]. 中国男科学杂志, 2016, 30(3): 23-27.
[10] DELONG E R, DELONG D M, CLARKE-PEARSON D L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach[J]. Biometrics, 1988, 44(3): 837-845.
[11] 黄芳, 党丽云, 孙惠平, 等. 三种分子生物学诊断技术对结核病诊断价值的比较[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2015, 38(9): 680-685.
[12] 张宏萍, 包杰. 实时荧光核酸恒温扩增技术和尿液快速检测法对孕前优生健康检查人群中淋球菌检测的应用比较[J]. 数理医药学杂志, 2018, 31(6): 907-909.
[13] 闫泽晨, 商学军, 刘玮, 等. 生殖支原体感染对男性不育患者精液质量的影响[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2018, 24(4): 317-321.
[14] 钟春燕, 章小花, 裘新民, 等. 实时荧光核酸恒温扩增技术在淋球菌检测中的应用评价[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2015, 25(23): 67-68, 71.
[15] 高志华, 金印, 陈峰. 实时荧光核酸恒温扩增技术检测尿液中淋球菌的分析[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2012, 33(4): 463-464.
[16] 王艳青, 王丽, 刘全忠. PCR法检测尿液中淋球菌[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2008, 41(5): 340-341.
[17] MAYOR M T, ROETT M A, UDUHIRI K A. Diagnosis and management of gonococcal infections[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2012, 86(10): 931-938.
[18] CUI Z, WANG Y, FANG L, et al. Novel real-time simultaneous amplification and testing method to accurately and rapidly detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2012, 50(3): 646-650.
[19] 张睿, 叶阿里, 孔令君, 等. 临床患者三种性传播疾病分子生物学检测分析[J]. 现代检验医学杂志, 2015, 30(3): 107-110.
[20] 李凯强, 许松, 张国巍, 等. 首段和中段尿中前列腺小体外泄蛋白对慢性前列腺炎诊断价值的比较[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2018, 24(10): 898-902.
|
|
|
|