|
|
|
| The clinical effect of free body position on promoting natural delivery |
| JIANG Qingzhi, ZHENG Xiaohua, JU Meiyuan |
| Department of Obstetrics, Longyou Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Quzhou, 324400 |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
JIANG Qingzhi,ZHENG Xiaohua,JU Meiyuan. The clinical effect of free body position on promoting natural delivery[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2018, 48(6): 459-462.
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To study the effects of free position during the first and second stages of labor on natural delivery. Methods: A total 240 of pregnant women who delivered in our hospital were enrolled into this study from June 2013 to February 2014. They were randomly divided into observation and control group, with 120 cases in each. Women in the control group took lithotomy position the whole process, held breath and gave birth hard. For observation group, women could freely chose any comfortable body position such as lying, walking,standing, sitting, kneeling, creeping or squatting on delivery during the first and second stage of labor, and used lithotomy position when delivering. The effects between two groups were observed and compared in terms of uterine cervix dilatation, time of the labor duration, maternal postpartum hemorrhage rate, neonatal Apgar score and postpartum discomfort rate. Results: The natural delivery rate of the observation group was significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05). The time of total labor and the maternal postpartum hemorrhage rate of the observation group was less than the control group (P<0.05). The neonatal Apgar score≥8 of the observation group was obviously better than that of control group (P<0.05). Satisfaction rate of pregnant women in the observation group was higher than that of the control group. There’s statistical difference (P<0.05) between the two groups. Conclusion: Freely chosen body positions during the first and second stages of labor process can promote natural delivery, shorten the time of labor, reduce maternal and neonatal complications and secure the health of mothers and babies. Besides, it improves satisfaction degree of pregnant women and the skills and competency of health care workers.
|
|
Received: 07 January 2018
|
| |
|
|
|
[1] 林虎. 我国剖宫产现状及思考[J]. 温州医科大学学报, 2015, 45(11): 849-853.
[2] 廖玲, 廖东林, 李慧敏, 等. 产程中镇痛分娩配合体位护理的临床研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2012, 27(16): 1472-1474.
[3] 金栩冰, 金佳希, 黄贤苹, 等. 新产程标准在温州地区临床
应用的可行性[J]. 温州医科大学学报, 2017, 47(4): 290-292.
[4] 乐杰. 妇产科学[M]. 7版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 57-58.
[5] PARASURAMAN A, ZEITHAML V A, BERRY L L. SERVQUAL a multiple-item scale for measuring consumerperceptions of service quality[J]. Retailing, 1988, 64(1): 12-40.
[6] 吴娜, 庄薇, 厉跃红. 分娩球配合自由体位助产的研究现状[J]. 护理学杂志, 2012, 27(16): 92-94.
[7] 李妙, 叶雪健. 第一产程自由体位对分娩的影响[J]. 当代医学, 2012, 18(35): 104-105.
[8] 黄雪霞, 郑迅风, 黄晓玲, 等. 第一产程自由体位与常规卧位对分娩结局的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2015, 30(21): 3573-3574.
[9] 零恒莉, 潘茹, 杨晓娅, 等. 第二产程产妇自由体位分娩效果的研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2007, 23(6): 20-22.
[10] 黄丽华, 肖震萍. 初产妇第二产程最佳用力时机探讨[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2012, 21(8): 662-663.
[11] DEJONGE A, TEUNISSEN T A, LAGROJANSSEN A L. Supine position compared to other positions during the second stage of labor: a metaanalytic review[J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2004, 25(1): 35-45.
[12] 华嘉增. 为人人享有生殖健康的目标而奋斗[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2003, 19(1): 1-2.
[13] 褚丽艳, 武志清, 郭考辰, 等. 体位管理在分娩过程中的应用价值[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2013, 29(3): 515-516. |
|
|
|
