|
|
Effect of smear layer thickness on bonding strength of two-step self-etching dentin bonding system |
ZHENG Tieli1, ZHANG Jiahui2, MAO Jiajie2, GU qin2. |
1.Department of Prothodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027; 2.College of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035 |
|
Cite this article: |
ZHENG Tieli,ZHANG Jiahui,MAO Jiajie, et al. Effect of smear layer thickness on bonding strength of two-step self-etching dentin bonding system[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2018, 48(6): 433-436.
|
|
Abstract Objective: To compare the influence of the smear layer generated by the high-speed diamond bur or 600 grit silicon carbide paper on the microtensile bond strength (uTBS) of a two-step self-etching adhesive to human dentin. Methods: Flat medium occlusal dentin surfaces of 28 premolars were exposed and divided into 2 groups for further grinding with either a high-speed diamond or 600 grit silicon carbide paper. Two prepared dentin surfaces treated by each method were evaluated for the characteristics of smear layer using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Twelve specimens from each grinded group were applied with a 2-step self-etching adhesive (OptiBond XTR), then built up with a resin composite. Each bonded specimen was sectioned into 1 mm-thick slab perpendicular to bonded interface.Six slabs from each group were randomly selected for observation of the bonded interface using SEM. Other slabs were cut into 1 mm×1 mm specimens. Fifteen specimens were randomly selected to be tested for microtensile bond strength. Results: The high-speed diamond bur created a significantly thicker and more rough smear layer than the silican carbide paper. There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) in microtensile bond strength between the groups. The 2-step self-etching adhesive (OptiBond XTR) could infiltrate well into the peritubular and intratubular dentin, then hybrid layer and resin tags were formed. Conclusion: Different smear layers had no significant influence on the uTBS of Optibond XTR bond to dentin.
|
Received: 21 November 2017
|
|
|
|
|
[1] MILIA E, CUMBO E, CARDOSO R J, et al. Current dental adhesives systems. A narrative review[J]. Curr Pharm Des, 2012, 18(34): 5542-5552.
[2] VANAJASAN P P, DHAKSHINAMOORTHY M, RAO C S. Factors affecting the bond strength of self-etch adhesives: A meta-analysis of literature[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2011, 14(1): 62-67. [3] VIOLICH D R, CHANDLER N P. The smear layer in endodontics-a review[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 43(1): 2-15.
[4] OLIVEIRA S S, PUGACH M K, HILTON J F, et al. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system[J]. Dent Mater, 2003, 19(8): 758-767.
[5] 费健, 骆小平, 陈亚琴, 等. 不同表面粒度车针预备所致玷污层对牙本质粘结强度的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2007, 23(4): 408-410.
[6] SHINODA Y, NAKAJIMA M, HOSAKA K, et al. Effect of smear layer characteristics on dentin bonding durability of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing one-step self-etch adhe-sives[J]. Dent Mater J, 2011, 30(4): 501-510.
[7] YIU C K, HIRAISHI N, KING N M, et al. Effect of dentinal surface preparation on bond strength of self-etching adhe-sives[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2008, 10(3): 173-182.
[8] THANATVARAKORN O, NAKAJIMA M, PRASANSUTTIPORN T, et al. Effect of smear layer deproteinizing on resin-dentine interface with self-etch adhesive[J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(3): 298-304.
[9] RIRATTANAPONG P, SENAWONGSE P, HARNIRATTISAL C, et al. Effect of smear layers created by different burs on durability of self-etching adhesive bond to dentin of primary teeth[J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2015, 39(3): 224-230.
[10] HEGDE M N, MANJUNATH J. Bond strength of newer dentin bonding agents in different clinical situations[J]. Oper Dent, 2011, 36(2):169-176.
[11] SILVA E S M H, CARNEIRO K G, LOBATO M F, et al. Adhesive systems: important aspects related to their composition and clinical use[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2010, 18(3): 207-214.
[12] MEHARRY M R, MOAZZAMI S M, LI Y. Comparison of enamel and dentin shear bond strengths of current dental bonding adhesives from three bond generations[J]. Oper Dent, 2013, 38(6): E237-245.
[13] KRäMER N, TILCH D, LüCKER S, et al. Status of ten self-etch adhesives for bonding to dentin of primary teeth[J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2014, 24(3): 192-199.
[14] WANG R, SHI Y, LI T, et al. Adhesive interfacial characteristics and the related bonding performance of four self-etching adhesives with different functional monomers applied to dentin[J]. J Dent, 2017, 62: 72-80.
[15] TAKAMIZAWA T, BARKMEIER W W, SAI K, et al. Influence of different smear layers on bond durability of self-etch adhesives[J]. Dent Mater, 2018, 34(2): 246-259. |
|
|
|