肱骨头置换术治疗效果影响因素分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1407 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To explore the influencing factors of humeral head arthroplasty surgery effect. Methods: From January 2010 to January 2014, 52 cases of proximal humeral comminuted fractures with treatment of the humeral head arthroplasty were selected. The 8 indicators that may affect humeral head arthroplasty surgery effectiveness were recorded and analyzed by logistic regression analysis, including age, sex, cause of injury, type of fracture, time from injury to surgery, time to start exercising after surgery, whether the patient is regularly followed-up and whether the patient is accompanied by osteoporosis. ASES scoring was applied to assess the outcome of the treatment. Results: Univariate analysis showed that there’s statistical difference (P<0.05) in age, time from injury to surgery, time to start exercising after surgery, whether the patient is regularly followed-up and whether the patient is accompanied by osteoporosis. There’s no significant difference (P>0.05) in gender, cause of injury and type of fracture. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (P<0.001, OR=1.127), time from injury to surgery (P<0.001, OR=1.104), time to start exercising after surgery (P<0.001, OR=1.064), and regular follow-up (P<0.001, OR=0.088) were the influencing factors, but osteoporosis was not (P=0.573, OR=1.102). Conclusion: Age, time from injury to surgery, time to start exercising after surgery and regular follow-up may be the chief factors affecting humeral head arthroplasty surgery effect, which should be taken into consideration for individualized treatment.

Key words： humeral head arthroplasty surgery risk factors humeral fractures regression analysis

Received: 20 February 2017

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Chunhui
	ZHANG Chuanxu
	CAI Leyi
	ZHENG Wenhao
	TAO Zhenyu
	CHEN Hua

URL:

https://xb.wmu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.wmu.edu.cn/EN/Y2018/V48/I3/189

[1] LAUNONEN A P, SUMREIN B O, LEPOLA V. Treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly[J]. Duodecim, 2017, 133(4): 353-358.
[2] KANNUS P, PALVANEN M, NIEMI S, et al. Rate of proximal humeral fractures in older Finnish women between 1970 and 2007[J]. Bone, 2009, 44(4): 656-659.
[3] BOYER E, MENU G, LOISEL F, et al. Cementless and locked prosthesis for the treatment of 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: prospective clinical evaluation of hemi- and reverse arthroplasty[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2017, 27(3): 301-308.
[4] RODIA F, THEODORAKIS E, TOULOUPAKIS G, et al. Fixation of complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients with a locking plate: A retrospective analysis of radiographic and clinical outcome and complications[J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2016, 5(80): 860-867.
[5] NEER C S 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation[J]. J Bone Jt Surg Am, 1970, 52(6): 1077-1089.
[6] PIITULAINEN K, PALONEVA J, YLINEN J, et al. Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form, patient self-report section[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2014, 15: 272.
[7] Raiss P, Edwards T B, Collin P, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for malunions of the proximal part of the humerus (type-4 fracture sequelae)[J]. J Bone Jt Surg Am, 2016, 98(11): 893-899.
[8] Park Y K, Kim S H, Oh J H. Intermediate-term outcome of hemiarthroplasty for comminuted proximal humerus frac-tures[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 26(1): 85-91.
[9] URI O, BECKLES V, HIGGS D, et al. Increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of failed post-traumatic humeral head replacement[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2014, 23(3): 401-408.
[10] PARKS D L, CASAGRANDE D J, SCHRUMPF M A, et al. Radiographic and clinical outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty with an all-polyethylene pegged bone ingrowth glenoid component: prospective short- to medium-term follow-up[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(2): 246-255.
[11] MERKLE T P, BECKMANN N, BRUCKNER T, et al. Shoulder joint replacement can improve quality of life and outcome in patients with dysmelia: a case series[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2016, 17: 185.
[12] IAGULLI N D, FIELD L D, HOBGOOD E R, et al. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the humeral head in young, active patients: midterm results[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2016, 2(1): 23-25
[13] 吴鹏, 郎俊哲, 刘扬波, 等. 全膝关节置换术股骨远端外翻角影响因素探讨[J]. 温州医科大学学报, 2016, 46(12): 878-882.
[14] BEAUDREUIL J, OSTERTAG A, LASBLEIZ S, et al. Efficacy of dynamic humeral centering according to NEER test results: a stratified analysis of a randomized-controlled trial [J]. Int J Rehabil Res, 2015, 38(1): 81-83.
[15] LAVER L, GARRIGUES G E. Avoiding superior tilt in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a review of the literature and technical recommendations[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2014, 23(10): 1582-1590.

[1]	. [J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2022, 52(8): 0-.