Comparison of different ovary stimulation protocols in vitro maturation of polycystic ovary syndrome patients
JIN Congcong1, WANG Peiyu1, LIN Jia1, WU Yanhong1, ZHOU Wei1, ZHAO Junzhao2
1.Reproductive Medicine Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325015; 2.Reproductive Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027
JIN Congcong,WANG Peiyu,LIN Jia, et al. Comparison of different ovary stimulation protocols in vitro maturation of polycystic ovary syndrome patients[J]. JOURNAL OF WEZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2017, 47(6): 441-444.
摘要目的:比较在未成熟卵母细胞体外成熟(IVM)技术中,多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者2种促排卵方案的临床结局。方法:回顾性分析2005年1月至2015年12月于温州医科大学附属第一医院生殖医学中心行IVM治疗的PCOS患者的实验室结果及临床结局,共164个周期分2组,A组为黄体期长方案体外受精(IVF)改行IVM,共116个周期;B组为微刺激IVM周期,共48个周期。结果:A组促性腺激素(Gn)用量为(1 008.83± 579.68)IU显著高于B组的(540.52±329.16)IU,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组的获卵数为(13.35±7.36)个,与B组获卵数(17.63±11.6)个比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组的临床妊娠率(45.95% vs. 53.33%)及种植率(23.18% vs. 24.37%)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组的流产率为8.11%,较B组20.00%低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组活产率为32.43%,与B组28.89%比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:PCOS患者行IVF改行IVM或微刺激IVM均可获得较好的临床妊娠率,IVF改行IVM可获得相对低流产率及高活产率,不失为一种有效的补充方法,可以降低周期取消率,增加患者的妊娠机会。
Abstract:Objective: To compare the effectiveness of two clinical stimulated protocols in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients. Methods: Laboratory and clinical results were analyzed retrospectively for PCOS patients in IVM from January 2005 to December 2015 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The overall 164 cycles were divided into two groups according to the stimulation protocol used, group A, IVM followed standard luteal long protocol (116 cycles) and group B, mild stimulated IVM (48 cycles). Basal characteristic, laboratory and clinical outcomes were used to assess the influence of different stimulated IVM in PCOS patients. Results: In the group A, the total dose of gonadotropin (1 008.83±579.68) IU was statistically higher than that in group B (540.52±329.16) IU (P<0.05). Numbers of oocytes retrieved of group A was significantly lower than that in group B (P<0.05). The group A also showed lower miscarriage rates compared to the other group (8.11% vs. 20.00%, P<0.05). The differences of embryo implantation rate (23.18% vs. 24.37%), clinical pregnant rate (45.95% vs. 53.33%) and live birth rate (32.43% vs. 28.89%) between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion: PCOS patients using IVF convert in IVM cycles or gonadotropin priming IVM received the similar clinical pregnant rate compared with traditional IVF. However, the lower miscarriage rate of IVM converted from conventional stimulated IVF may lead to more clinical application.
[1] HART R. PCOS and infertility[J]. Panminerva Med, 2008, 50(4): 305-314.
[2] 王佩玉, 赵军招, 金聪聪, 等. IVM技术在PCOS与非PCOS患者促排卵与未刺激周期中的临床应用比较[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2014, 49(12): 903-908.
[3] CHA K Y, KOO J J, KO J J, et al. Pregnancy after in vitro fertilization of human follicular oocytes collected from nonstimulated cycles their culture in vitro and their transfer in a donor oocyte program[J]. Fertil Steril, 1991, 55(1): 109-113.
[4] ZHAO J Z, ZHOU W, ZHANG W, et al. In vitro maturation and fertilization of oocytes from unstimulated ovaries in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. Fertil Steril, 2009, 91(6): 2568-2571.
[5] LEON P M, CAMPOS V F, KAEFER C, et al. Expression of apoptotic genes in immature and in vitro matured equine oocytes and cumulus cells[J]. Zygote, 2013, 21(3): 279-285.
[6] Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-terra health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. Fertil Steril, 2004, 81(1): 19-25.
[7] 黄绘, 洪焱, 冯玉蓉, 等. 未成熟卵体外成熟技术在卵巢高反应患者IVF-ET中的应用[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2012,20(6): 401-406.
[8] SIRISTATIDIS C, SERGENTANIS T N, VOGIATZI P, et al. In vitro maturation in women with vs. without polycystic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(8): e0134696.
[9] 李晓峰, 蔡素芬, 龚斐. 未成熟卵母细胞体外培养技术助孕治疗多囊卵巢综合征疗效研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2014, 30(12): 958-961.
[10] CHANG E M, SONG H S, LEE D R, et al. In vitro maturation of human oocytes: Its role in infertility treatment and new possibilities[J]. Clin Exp Reprod Med, 2014, 41(2): 41-46.
[11] CHOAVARATANA R, THANABOONYAWAT I, LAOKI-RKKIAT P, et al. Outcomes of follicle-stimulating hormone priming and nonpriming in in vitro maturation of oocytes in infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a single-blinded randomized study[J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2015, 79(3): 153-159.
[12] SHALOM-PAZ E, MARZAL A, WISER A, et al. Effects of different body mass indices on in vitro maturation in women with polycystic ovaries[J]. Fertil Steril, 2011, 96(2): 336-339.
[13] MAO G H, FENG Z, HE Y, et al. Comparisons of the effects of long-acting and short-acting GnRH aganists on embryo quality, endometrial thickness and pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization[J]. Arch Med Sci, 2014, 10(1): 161-166.
[14] SHAVIT T, ELLENBOGEN A, MICHAELI M, et al. In-vitro maturation of oocytes vs in-vitro fertilization with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: can superiority be defined?[J]. Euro J Obset Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2014, 179: 46-50.