妊娠晚期瘢痕子宫下段厚度的影响因素分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1420 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：探讨妊娠晚期瘢痕子宫下段厚度的影响因素。方法：回顾性分析2011年6月至2013年12月于我院行磁共振成像（MRI）检查的妊娠晚期（36～40周）患者74例，其中有剖宫产史孕妇34例（剖宫产组），经阴道分娩史孕妇40例（对照组）。在MRI图像上分别测量2组孕妇子宫下段的厚度，采用线性回归模型分析孕妇的年龄、孕周、剖宫产史、剖宫产的次数、距上次剖宫产的间隔时间等因素对子宫下段厚度的影响。结果：剖宫产组孕妇子宫下段厚度为（3.34±0.71）mm，对照组孕妇子宫下段厚度为（3.97±1.08）mm，2组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。线性回归模型中，剖宫产史对子宫下段厚度的影响差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），孕妇的年龄、孕周、剖宫产的次数、距上次剖宫产的间隔时间对子宫下段厚度的影响差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：剖宫产史是影响妊娠晚期瘢痕子宫下段厚度的主要因素。

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	付玉川
	刘倩
	黄雅楠
	朱欢乐
	刘锟
	严志汉

关键词 ：磁共振成像, 剖宫产术, 子宫下段厚度, 影响因素

Abstract：Objective: To explore the influencing factors of the lower uterine segment thickness after cesarean delivery during the third trimester of pregnancy. Methods: 74 pregnant women undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination at third-trimester in our hostipal from June 2011 to December 2013 were include, 34 with a history of cesarean delivery and 40 control subjects with a history of vaginal delivery, the lower uterine segment thickness was measured on MRI. The maternal age, gestational age, previous cesarean, numbers of cesareans, interval time after cesarean influence on the lower uterine segment thickness were emphatically analyzed with a linear regression model. Results: The lower uterine segment was significantly thinner in women with a previous cesarean delivery compared with control subjects (3.34±0.71 versus 3.97±1.08 mm, P<0.05). In a linear regression model, the only variable retaining significance in the prediction of uterine wall thickness was previous cesarean delivery (P<0.05). Maternal age, gestational age, number of cesareans, and interval time after cesarean did not attain significance in the model (P>0.05). Conclusion: The previous cesarean delivery is the main factor influencing the lower uterine segment thickness after cesarean delivery during the third trimester of pregnancy.

Key words： magnetic resonance imaging cesarean section lower uterine segment thickness influencing factors

收稿日期: 2015-01-21

通讯作者: 严志汉，主任医师，Email：yanzhihanwz@163.com。

作者简介: 付玉川（1985-），女，江西萍乡人，住院医师，硕士。

链接本文:

https://xb.wmu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 https://xb.wmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2015/V45/I11/819

[1] American college of obstetricians and gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116(2): 450-463.
[2] Asakura H, Nakai A, Ishikawa G, et al. Prediction of uterine dehiscence by measuring lower uterine segment thickness prior to the onset of labor: evaluation by transvaginal ultrasonography[J]. J Nippon Med Sch, 2000, 67(5): 352-356.
[3] Gotoh H, Masuzaki H, Yoshida A, et al. Predicting incomplete uterine rupture with vaginal sonography during the late second trimester in women with prior cesarean[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 95(4): 596-600.
[4] Sen S, Malik S, Salhan S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2004, 87(3): 215-219.
[5] Cheung VY. Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2005, 27(7): 674-681.
[6] Celeste P, Durnwald MD, Mercer BM. Myometrial thickness according to uterine site, gestational age and prior cesarean delivery[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2008, 21(4): 247-250.
[7] Ginsberg Y, Goldstein I, Lowenstein L, et al. Measurements of the lower uterine segment during gestation[J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2013, 41(4): 214-217.
[8] Sambaziotis H, Conway C, Figueroa R, et al. Second-trimester sonographic comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without a previous cesarean delivery[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2004, 23(7): 907-911.
[9] Nguyen TV, Dihn TV, Suresh MS, et a1. Vaginal birth after cesarean section at the university of texas[J]. J Reprod Med,1992, 37(10): 880-882.
[10] Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, et al. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 42(2): 132-139.
[11] Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery[J]. New England J Med, 2004, 351(25):2581-2589.
[12] Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001, 345(1): 3-8.
[13] Chauhan SP, Martin JN Jr, Henrichs CE, et al. Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a review of the literature[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003,189(2): 408-417.
[14] Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Neonatal morbidity associated with uterine rupture: what are the risk factors[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 186(2): 311-314.
[15] Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, et al. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section[J]. BMJ, 2004, 329 (7456): 19-25.
[16] Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, et al. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 201(3): 320.e1-320. e6.
[17] Dodd J, Crowther CA. Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: A survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand[J]. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol, 2003, 43(3): 226-231.
[18] 陆宣平, 陈友国, 韩冰. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的研究进展[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2014, 30(4): 260-262.
[19] Martel MJ, MacKinnon CJ. Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2005, 27(2): 164-188.
[20] 吴彩林, 陈新, 邱伟修, 等. 瘢痕子宫试产结局与分娩间隔及子宫下段厚度的关系[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2013, 29(11): 826-829.