剖宫产史对体外受精-胚胎移植治疗结局的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2021.07.010

摘要
图/表
参考文献(17)
相关文章 (8)

全文: PDF (1323 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：探讨剖宫产史对体外受精-胚胎移植（IVF-ET）治疗结局的影响。方法：回顾性分析2019年1月至2019 年12月温州医科大学附属第二医院育英儿童医院生殖中心接受IVF-ET的患者，根据患者的分娩史分为仅有阴道分娩史组（292例）和剖宫产史组（311例），比较2组胚胎植入成功率及治疗结局等。结果：剖宫产史组的胚胎植入成功率低于仅有阴道分娩史组（P ＜0.05）。2组间的流产率、双胎率、异位妊娠率差异无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）。2组间早产、死产、出生体质量、出生缺陷、胎盘前置和产后出血等指标差异无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）。结论：剖宫产史影响了IVF-ET再妊娠的胚胎植入成功率，但剖宫产史对患者的流产率等治疗结局无明显影响。

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈慧慧
	叶锦斌
	卢晓声
	习海涛
	赵军招

关键词 ：剖宫产史, 体外受精, 胚胎植入成功率, 流产率, 治疗结局

Abstract：Objective: To investigate the effect of prior cesarean delivery (CD) on the clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Methods: Clinical data of women who underwent IVF-ET in the assisted reproduction technology center of the Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2019 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to their delivery history, patients with a history of live birth by CD were assigned to the CD group (n=292), and those with only vaginal delivery (VD) were categorized into the VD group (n=311). The embryo implantation rate and treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: The embryo implantation rate of VD group was significantly higher than VD group (P<0.05). However, there was no statistical difference in miscarriage rate, twinning rate and incidence of ectopic pregnancy between the two groups, neither in indexes of premature, stillbirth, birth weight, birth defects, placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage. Conclusion: A prior CD does affect the embryo implantation rate, but it is not associated with increased risk of miscarriage and other adverse treatment outcomes in IVF patients.

Key words： prior cesarean in vitro fertilization embryo implantation rate miscarriage rate pregnancy outcome

收稿日期: 2021-01-14

通讯作者: 赵军招，主任医师 E-mail: z.joyce08@163.com。

作者简介: 陈慧慧，硕士生，Email：2879712258@qq.com。

链接本文:

https://xb.wmu.edu.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2021.07.010 或 https://xb.wmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V51/I7/574

[1] FENG X L, XU L, GUO Y, et al. Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008[J].Bull World Health Organ, 2012, 90(1): 30-39, 39A.
[2] VAN DEN TWEEL M M, KLIJN N F, DIAZ DE POOL J D N,et al. Previous caesarean section is associated with lower subsequent in vitro fertilization live birth rates[J]. Hum Fertil(Camb), 2019(12): 1-6.
[3] NAJI O, ABDALLAH Y, BIJ DE VAATE A J, et al.Standardized approach for imaging and measuring cesarean section scars using ultrasonography[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 39(3): 252-259.
[4] LITWICKA K, GRECO E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: A review of management options[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 25(6): 456-461.
[5] SONGANE F F, THOBANI S, MALIK H, et al. Balancing the risks of planned cesarean section and trial of vaginal delivery for the mature, selected, singleton breech presentation[J]. J Perinat Med, 1987, 15(6): 531-543.
[6] CONG J, LI P, ZHENG L, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of infertility at a rural site of northern China[J]. PLoS One,2016, 11(5): e0155563.
[7] YE J, ZHANG J, MIKOLAJCZYK R, et al. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: A worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data[J]. BJOG, 2016,123(5): 745-753.
[8] FENG X L, WANG Y, AN L, et al. Cesarean section in the People’s Republic of China: Current perspectives[J]. Int J Womens Health, 2014, 6: 59-74.
[9] SANDALL J, TRIBE R M, AVERY L, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women children[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10155): 1349-1357.
[10] WANG Y Q, YIN T L, XU W M, et al. Reproductive outcomes in women with prior cesarean section undergoing in vitro fertilization: A retrospective case-control study[J]. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2017, 37(6): 922-927.
[11] ZHANG N, CHEN H, XU Z, et al. Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patient with previous cesarean scar[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2016,22: 3288-3295.
[12] BEN-NAGI J, WALKER A, JURKOVIC D, et al. Effect of cesarean delivery on the endometrium[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 106(1): 30-34.
[13] NAJI O, WYNANTS L, SMITH A, et al. Does the presence of a caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit?[J]. Hum Reprod, 2013, 28(6): 1489-1496.
[14] DESTEPHANO C C, JERNIGAN A M, SZYMANSKI L M.Iatrogenic uterine diverticulum in pregnancy after roboticassisted myomectomy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015,22(5): 902-905.
[15] BROSENS J J, GELLERSEN B. Something new about early pregnancy: Decidual biosensoring and natural embryo selection[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 36(1): 1-5.
[16] KEAG O E, NORMAN J E, STOCK S J. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother,baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS Med, 2018, 15(1): e1002494.
[17] DALTVEIT A K, TOLLANES M C, PIHLSTROM H, et al.Cesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancies[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 111(6): 1327-1334.