颈中央脊髓损伤综合征的远期疗效及预后影响因素

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1308 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：评估颈中央脊髓损伤综合征（CCS）的远期疗效，分析其疗效及预后的影响因素。方法：回顾性分析2008年1月至2011年12月在宁波大学医学院附属医院接受住院治疗的72例CCS患者的资料。运用JOA评分法对入院及末次随访时患者神经功能进行评估，采用简单线性回归分析和多重线性回归分析对可能影响疗效及预后的因素进行单因素及多因素分析。结果：末次随访时JOA评分均值由治疗前的（10.13± 3.54）分增加至（14.14±2.53）分，JOA改善率为（59.49±31.80）%。手术治疗患者JOA改善率明显优于保守治疗，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。在对各项疗效及预后因素进行简单线性回归分析和多重线性回归分析后显示，年龄与治疗方式是疗效的影响因素，入院JOA评分、激素冲击治疗是预后的影响因素。结论：年龄较大的患者疗效较差，手术治疗的疗效优于保守治疗，而初始神经功能损害程度较重、接受激素冲击治疗的患者往往预后越差。

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	叶一
	宋焕军
	叶志方
	蒋国强

关键词 ：颈椎, 脊髓损伤, 疗效, 预后

Abstract：Objective: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of central cord syndrome (CCS) and analyze the influencing factors of long-term efficacy and prognosis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 72 patients with CCS who were hospitalized at the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University from January 2008 to December 2011. The neurological function of the patients was assessed by the JOA score method on admission and at the final follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using simple linear regression analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. Results: At the final follow-up visit, the mean JOA score increased from (10.13± 3.54) points to (14.14±2.53) points, and the JOA improvement rate was (59.49±31.80)%. The JOA improvement was significantly better than conservative treatment in the patients undergoing surgery. The difference was significant (P<0.05). After simple factor linear regression analysis and multivariate linear regression analysis of the various factors influencing the long-term efficacy and prognosis, it was shown that age and treatment were independent factors of the efficacy, and admission JOA score and hormone shock therapy were independent factors of the prognosis. Conclusion: It is less effective in the elder patients. Surgical treatment is superior to conservative treatment. Patients with severe initial neurological impairment and hormone shock treatment often have poorer prognosis.

Key words： cervical spinal cord injury efficacy prognosis

收稿日期: 2018-03-27

基金资助:浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目（2015KYB338）。

通讯作者: 蒋国强，主任医师，硕士生导师，Email：13605740504@163.com。

作者简介: 叶一（1979-），男，浙江慈溪人，副主任医师，硕士。

链接本文:

https://xb.wmu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 https://xb.wmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V48/I11/833

[1] MCKINLEY W, SANTOS K, MEADE M, et al. Incidence and outcomes of spinal cord injury clinical syndromes[J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2007, 30(3): 215-224.
[2] SCHNEIDER R C, CHERRY G, PANTEK H. The syndrome of acute central cervical spinal cord injury, with special reference to the mechanisms involved in hyperextension injuries of cervical spine[J]. J Neurosurg, 1954, 11(6): 546-577.
[3] SAMUEL A M, ANANDASIVAM N S, DIAZ-COLLADO P J. Management of acute traumatic central cord syn-drome[J]. Contemporary Spine Surgery, 2016, 17(10): 1-7.
[4] 戴宇森, 陈岩, 滕红林, 等. 单纯上肢受累型与四肢受累型急性中央颈脊髓损伤的临床特点[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2017, 33(7): 634-639.
[5] THOMPSON C, GONSALVES J F, WELSH D. Hyperextension injury of the cervical spine with central cord syn-drome[J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24(1): 195-202.
[6] HARROP J S, SHARAN A, RATLIFF J. Central cord injury: pathophysiology, management, and outcomes[J]. Spine, 2006, 6(6): 198S-206S.
[7] 贾连顺. 对过伸性颈脊髓损伤的再认识[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2007, 45(6): 363-365.
[8] PENROD L E, HEGDE S K, DITUNNO J F JR. Age effect on prognosis for functional recovery in acute, traumatic central cord syndrome[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehab, 1990, 71(12): 963-968.
[9] 马晓生, 姜建元, 吕飞舟, 等. 无骨折脱位颈脊髓中央损伤综合征的手术疗效及其影响因素[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2015, 25(4): 298-303.
[10] AARABI B, HADLEY M N, DHALL S S, et al. Management of acute traumatic central cord syndrome (ATCCS)[J]. Neurosurgery, 2013, 72(2): 195-204.
[11] BOSCH A, STAUFFER E S, NICKEL V L. Incomplete traumatic quadriplegia: a ten-year review[J]. JAMA, 1971, 216(3): 473- 478.
[12] 王新伟, 袁文. 急性创伤性颈中央脊髓损伤综合征的再认识[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(2): 191-193.
[13] STEVENS E A, MARSH R, WILSON J A, et al. A review of surgical intervention in the setting of traumatic central cord syndrome[J]. Spine J, 2010, 10(10): 874-880.
[14] DVORAK M F, FISHER C G, HOEKEMA J, et al. Factors predicting motor recovery and functional outcome after traumatic central cord syndrome: a long-term follow-up[J]. Spine, 2005, 30(20): 2303-2311.
[15] HOHL J B, LEE J Y, HORTON J A, et al. A novel classification system for traumatic central cord syndrome: the cental cord injury scale (CCIS)[J]. Spine, 2010, 35(7): E238-243.